According to their website, the original idea was to end the
greed and corruption of the 1% by adopting the Arab Spring tactics. Apparently
the goal has not been achieved. Instead, according to surveys conducted in
2011, people viewed the movement as public nuisance. I personally think the
movement could have made a bigger impact by having a plan, and incorporating the
following.
Clear call to action: ok, so I agree with the 99% vs 1% key
message, but what do I do next? No, I don’t know what I am supposed to do next.
OWS should really have thought about what they expect ordinary citizens to do
after attracting media attention.
Follow up: similar to the article, I totally agree creating
noise is only the first step, it is more crucial to follow up and create real
changes. Creating quotable quotes, assigning a strong spokesperson, creating
strong visuals, liaising with the media, liaising with the government, managing the social media presence,
managing the logistics for the occupation, and everything else that affects the OWS movement.
Planning: OWS was not really an organized event at the
beginning, and it certainly did not have a PR team. The structure of the
protest also meant they did not have a leader. Unfortunately, a leader is
crucial for liaising with different stakeholders, pulling everything together,
assigning tasks to different people, and seeing things through. They would not have a plan unless it is an
organization with funding support whether through donation or sales.
Measureable goals: measureable goals are crucial for
success. How can you know whether you have done a good job without setting
goals at the beginning? For OWS to gain any success, goal setting is mandatory.
CNN image
No comments:
Post a Comment