Liz shared the CAA Manitoba Worst Roads campaign with me.
This is a national campaign run by seven CAA Clubs in Canada each year. This
was CAA Manitoba’s second year running the campaign in 2013, and it lasted four
weeks.
Liz started by creating a complete program plan, which
included considerations for all marketing materials and PR/media opportunities,
such as the objective of the campaign, a list of target audience, a tactical
plan, key messages, a timeline, budget, media releases, media advisories, media
conference plan, promotional plans, PSA, pitches to the editors and evaluation.
Goal setting was the number one task, and the objectives for
CAA Manitoba were to:
1. Get people talking about the condition of roads, as
public opinion would help to persuade the government to listen and make
changes.
2. Provide various levels of government with CAA Manitoba's
research, so they could consider them when making their plan for infrastructure
in the coming years.
3. Increase the number of votes cast throughout the
four-week campaign.
Liz conducted some research for the campaign – though she
already had a lot of information in-house. The major part of work came from
researching what different levels of government had done in regards to
infrastructure investments, as it would affect the messaging. Liz and her
team also conducted a survey that went to 50,000 members asking for their
personal thoughts about the condition of the roads and highways. She used the
response as a hook for the entire campaign, as well as to persuade the government
using public opinion.
In terms of promotion, CAA Manitoba used online banner ads
on ChrisD.ca, placed ballot boxes in their branches, and put up posters on the
door at various branches, used the #mbroads hastag on Twitter, put up photos of
Worst Roads received from the public on their Facebook page, and also organized
a few other activities. In addition, they sent out two email blasts to its
members urging them to vote. The first one was sent to everyone, and the second
one was segmented (dividing those who had already voted, and those who had
not). The two emails were about two weeks apart.
The next stage was evaluation. Liz and her team would
monitor the media; for example, they found the story was the 8th most commented
story on the Winnipeg Free Press online version the day after the campaign was
launched. They also looked at the number of likes on the pictures and comments
posted on Facebook, and the retweets on Twitter (such as the retweet from the
Mayor of Brandon). As well as a tweet to a Brandon City Councillor which turned
into the editorial caricature in the Brandon Sun. In the evaluation process,
Liz also identified the unusually cold April weather with snow shifted the
focus from road preparation to flood preparation. It was not something you
could plan, therefore it was important to remain flexible wherever was possible
– and this is an important lesson for PR professionals.
In addition to the above, Liz also evaluated the
number of votes received during the campaign - which increased by 60 percent
year on year. She and her team also conducted a survey about how people
found out about the campaign. It turned out more people found out about the
campaign through the mass media (television, radio and newspapers) than the CAA
email that the members received. The evaluation process would help Liz to
formulate the same campaign in 2014.

No comments:
Post a Comment